tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3279887958085077691.post760705726919636079..comments2024-02-22T10:35:12.485-08:00Comments on Cultural Property Observer: Closed "Open Access" Debate?Cultural Property Observerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05924359202414555962noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3279887958085077691.post-90227415369899029412012-05-26T07:53:08.811-07:002012-05-26T07:53:08.811-07:00Thank you for the offer, but I believe my comment ...Thank you for the offer, but I believe my comment was entirely appropriate given your own post and your own playing games with links to the Open Access website. Having said that, I'm happy you are engaging with Wayne and Alfredo, though frankly based on prior experience, I doubt it will go anywhere positive.<br /><br />Sincerely,<br /><br /><br />Peter TompaCultural Property Observerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05924359202414555962noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3279887958085077691.post-38427194558483342662012-05-26T05:53:23.575-07:002012-05-26T05:53:23.575-07:00By all means you may re-post as long as you follow...By all means you may re-post as long as you follow my posting rules and refrain from attacking language and simply state why you disagree :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3279887958085077691.post-50910323130427780912012-05-25T15:52:43.876-07:002012-05-25T15:52:43.876-07:00Having now read the original post I must agree wit...Having now read the original post I must agree with your assessment: It was indeed a childish response. Playing games with links in no way equates to 'having a conversation' by any reasonable definition. It frankly makes it hard to take the man or his cause seriously at all. If he disagrees with the ACCG, why not simply write a blog post stating the fact?<br /><br />Voz EarlVoz Earlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11345952820382749813noreply@blogger.com