The statuary in question apparently arrived in the US years before import restrictions on undocumented Cambodian artifacts were imposed. Moreover, unlike the Sotheby's case, there does not appear to be any hard evidence that the statuary came from a specific site. Accordingly, at this point any Cambodian claims would seem to be based on little more than speculation and a cultural nationalist view that anything of Cambodian manufacture "belongs" to the modern nation state.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Henceforth, comments will only be posted from those who provide a full name, country of residence and basis for interest, i.e., collector, archaeologist, academic, etc. or their Blogger profile provides such information.