A Web Log Championing the Longstanding Interests of Collectors in the Preservation, Study, Display and Enjoyment of Cultural Artifacts Against an "Archaeology Over All" Perspective
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Some Thoughts on the Renewal of Cambodian MOU
Cambodia certainly has a far more sympathetic case than many
applicants for import restrictions. On
the other hand, I’m not sure that the case made to protect sculptural elements
from Khmer temples justifies import restrictions on everything and anything old
down to the 16th Century, including things like beads and
statuettes. I’d also like to know more
about collections formed in Cambodia itself, particularly the one evidently put
together by a government minister. Does his collection have any statutes or sculptural elements in it?
If so, where and when were they collected? It seems wrong to me that U.S. Government has filed suit against Sotheby’s demanding the return of a statute
that left Cambodia decades ago if wealthy Cambodians,
including at least one government minister, have been allowed to collect such
material “no questions asked.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Henceforth, comments will only be posted from those who provide a full name, country of residence and basis for interest, i.e., collector, archaeologist, academic, etc. or their Blogger profile provides such information.