"Hyperallergic," an Internet "forum for playful, serious, and radical perspectives on art and culture in the world today" has joined the Committee for Cultural Policy in taking on fantastical claims about ISIS funding itself with looted antiquities, albeit from a far different perspective. Tellingly, the post by archaeologist Michael Press -- though well researched-- avoids the elephant in the
room. Who was responsible for "weaponizing" antiquities in the
first place? The ISIS killing machine was bad enough to justify military intervention, particularly given its terror threats not only in the region but to Europe and the US as well.
Of course, the answer is quite apparent to
those who represent the interests of collectors, museums and the trade.
It is the State Department's Cultural Heritage Center, which worked along with
ASOR, the State Department contractor mentioned in the article, and the
Antiquities Coalition, a well-funded archaeological advocacy group with ties to ASOR, the
Archaeological Institute of America, as well as authoritarian Arab regimes.
These groups were quite successful in laundering their dubious narrative not only through mainstream media (NY Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, CBS,
etc.) but through the foreign policy establishment as well (think tanks and Foreign Policy
Magazine). The goal was threefold. First, getting Congress to pass permanent import restrictions
on Syrian cultural goods (which was achieved through these scare
tactics). Second, creating and funding an "Antiquities Czar"
position that would elevate these groups' influence even further
within the US Government. (A goal that was not realized.) Third, convincing Congress to lower the bar for criminal prosecutions based on foreign cultural patrimony laws. (Another goal that was not realized.) Meanwhile, those representing the interests of collectors, museums and the
trade that raised the exact same issues about the credibility of these fantastical
numbers early on have become targets for abuse from some of the very same individuals Press acknowledges for their contributions in exposing the truth.
Hello Peter:
ReplyDeleteThese peddlers of heritage fake news, mostly academic grant-grabbers (with a smattering of pig-ignorant camp followers) having an axe to grind, or, working to private agendas, rightly deserve censure. The street-corner rabble-rousers have been caught bang to rights with their fingers in the propaganda cookie jar.
I'm sure many loud-mouthed propagandists know the game is up and will be running for cover to both protect their backsides and what’s left of their reputations.
Happy days ahead perhaps.
Best
John Howland
UK Collector & Detectorist
Fact #1: Ancient coins have been collected and traded from literally the beginning of their existence in the 7th century BC.
ReplyDeleteFact #2: No culture on earth ever considered, much less imposed, trade controls on ancient coins before the rise of archaeology as a "science" and the acceptance of these scientists as "experts".
Fact #3: Many millions, if not billions, of ancient coins legally crossed national boundaries without controls of any kind as late as the early 20th century when archaeology (once a hobby itself) started to achieve some recognition as an academic subject of interest. There is literally no way to determine modern ownership of ancient coins based on point of origin.
Fact #4: Between 1970 and 2017 the archaeological community has aligned itself with a progressive socialist ideology that radically opposes private ownership.
Fact #5: Radicals never let truth prevail and readily pervert truth for the "greater good".
Is it any wonder we are where we are?
Hi WGS:
ReplyDeleteOoh... some of them are squealing right now! You and me are definitely off their Christmas card list - mainly because they were never Christians in the first place; being case-hardened, atheist commies. Facts 2, 3 & 4 have driven a stake through their hearts. They don't want Joe Public to know all about what they've been up to.
Archaeology sounds impressive to the casual observer, but in reality it's based on BS; it's all 'guess-timation' - a science it's not - though it's fooled in the UK at least, the Council for British Archaeology in to supporting the so-called Artefact Erosion Counter, a propagandist nonsense dreamed up by an itinerant Warsaw cab driver who hates collectors, detectorists, and anyone else who's not a radical socialist.
What a parlous state British archaeology and the CBA has become, unable to see the common sense wood for the socialist tress.
Best
John Howland
UK Collector & Detectorist