Tuesday, October 1, 2013
"Accusations" or Facts?
Archaeo-blogger Rick St. Hilaire claims that the amended answer filed by the ACCG in the ongoing forfeiture case is nothing but a bunch of "accusations." But those "accusations" are based on statements from two former CPAC members who reviewed the Chinese and Cypriot MOUs, the Congressional testimony of State's former Deputy Legal Adviser, and even an admission by the Cypriot Government itself. If St. Hilaire really believes the ACCG's "accusations" are as insubstantial as he claims, why not post a link to the ACCG's papers and let the reader decide for themselves?