Monday, February 4, 2019

Public Consultation on Proposed Changes to UK's Treasure Act

The UK Government is considering changes to the Treasure Act.   Collector based organizations have supported the Treasure Act because it encourages the reporting of finds.  It also ensures the State pays fair market value for finds it keeps and remits back all others to the finder, who may sell them on the open market.  The coins that are recorded are then uploaded on a publicly accessible website.   This has led to the availability of coins on the numismatic market that can be identified as coming from specific, UK find-spots and hoards. 

 Most of the proposed changes appear non-controversial, but certain of the proposals that require permits to metal detect, that create a new offense for purchases of undeclared artifacts, and declare archaeological finds Crown Property, are potentially very problematic. 

 A permit requirement could be used to preclude detecting from “archaeologically sensitive areas,” which could mean everything.

 The proposed new criminal sanction could catch unwary buyers of objects that did not realize they were buying "treasure."  Moreover, collectors should oppose the proposal's efforts to shift the burden of proof in a criminal matter.

 Declaring all finds crown property may be a way to avoid paying fair market value for finds the State retains.

If you are a metal detectorist, an ancient coin collector, or just think the UK's current PAS and Treasure Act do a great job of bringing the public, museums and archaeologists together in a joint effort to record and preserve the past, please consider commenting.
Comments are due on or before April 30, 2019.
For more about the issue, see
For a direct link to the consultation, see

1 comment:

Unknown said...

I have had two treasure finds one a very early gold posy ring with the inscription a+mery+hart+is+lyfe which was vastly undervalued by the TVC (Usual Practise)however I had written offers far in excess of what they were offering which eventually resulted in them offering a final valuation far lower than the offers I had received which left both the landowner and myself feeling cheated.
The second find was of a hoard of Saxon coins that had been in the hands of the Vikings (Confirmed by the acquiring museum Great North Museum of Newcastle)TVC disputed this (Do they know more than the museums?)consequently they devalued the first independent valuation from £3500 to £2500 they also said that some of the coins were damaged this happened while they were in the hands of the archaeologists, not my fault but financially penalised because of someones carelessness. J.Hall Prudhoe