On April 26, 2022, the US Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC) met to consider a proposed MOU with the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The following members were present: (1) Stefan Passantino (Chairman- Public); (2) Steven Bledsoe (Public); (3) Karol Wight (Museums); (4) J.D. Demming (Public); (5) Ricardo St. Hilaire (Archaeology); (6) Joan Connelly (Archaeology); Rachael Fulton Brown (Archaeology); (7) Anthony Wisniewski (Collector-Sale of International Cultural Property); (8) Mark Hendricks (Sale of International Cultural Property); and (9) David Tamasi (International Sale of Cultural Property). Allison Davis, CPAC’s State Department Executive Director, and Michele Prior, also of ECA, were also present.
Chairman Passantino welcomed the speakers. He indicated that the Committee had read all the comments which he found helpful and useful. As there were only four speakers, while a five-minute limit would be observed, there would be time left over for questions.
The following speakers addressed the Committee: (1) Dr. Brian Daniels (Archaeological Institute of America); (2) Randy Myers (Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG); (3) Peter Tompa (Peter Tompa Law representing the International Association of Professional Numismatists (IAPN)); and (4) Kate FitzGibbon (Committee for Cultural Policy and Global Heritage Alliance).
Dr. Brian Daniels (BD) indicated there was plenty of evidence of site looting, particularly of Gandharan material. This was most recently demonstrated by the NY DA’s recent repatriation of Gandharan sculpture. BD indicated that Pakistan met all the criteria for a MOU. There are antiquities laws on the books which are now enforced at a regional level. U.S.-Pakistani archaeological collaborations have taken place at Harappa in Punjab Province, Pakistan. Pakistani scholars have expressed an interest in supplying loans to US museums.
The AIA’s written comments can be found here: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2022-0008-0036
Randy Myers (RM) focused on two procedural objections and one substantive objection. He indicates that the notice period of fourteen days is simply too short to elicit much informed comment. He also indicates that the notice was procedurally deficient because there was little justification provided for the apparent inclusion of coins in this request. He stated that as a retired U.S. Government attorney who worked on administrative matters, he believed that the notice of this hearing provided to the public to comment was deficient. Substantively, RM focused on one issue related less drastic measures to be considered before import restrictions may be imposed. He indicated that Pakistan should consider a program akin to the Portable Antiquities Scheme and Treasure Act as an alternative to import restrictions on coins.
The ACCG’s written comments can be found here: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2022-0008-0007
Peter Tompa (PT) focused on three major points. First, how can Customs assume a given coin was “first discovered within” and “subject to” Pakistani export control given the overlap in find spots in Pakistan, India, Afghanistan and Bangladesh? Second, why restrict coins at all given the existence of a large internal market in Pakistan itself? The rationale for import restrictions is that they will dampen market demand and hence decrease the incentive for looting, but US import restrictions would only have a negligible impact on demand because the primary market for Pakistani coins appears to be within Pakistan itself. Finally, even if coins are restricted, CPAC should condition any import restrictions on coins on the provision the availability of easily obtainable export certificates.
The IAPN’s written comments can be found here: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2022-0008-0010
Kate FitzGibbon (KFG) starts her presentation discussing a screen shot posted on Twitter from 2020 showing construction workers smashing a large Gandharan Buddhist statue with sledgehammers in the city of Mardan, Pakistan. She goes on to describe poor stewardship of Pakistan’s cultural heritage that goes back at least to the 1970s. She notes that Pakistan has pawned off caring for cultural heritage to localities and that a scant $300,000 is spent annually on archaeology, which mostly goes to salaries of the cultural heritage bureaucracy. She suggests that lack of interest, lack of education and discomfort about teaching pre-Islamic history in schools are major culprits. However, the main problem is top to bottom corruption in Pakistani society. She urges that the State Department provide grants and educational help to try to build a cultural infrastructure that will enable basic protections inside Pakistan. She indicates this will be far more effective in safeguarding heritage than an MOU that will have no domestic effect inside Pakistan, and no legal justification under US law.
The CCPs and GHAs written submission can be found here: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2022-0008-0037
Chairman Passantino then allowed CPAC members a brief time for questions.
Anthony Wisniewski asks KFG about open sales of cultural heritage in Pakistan. She noted that coins are widely sold at the bazar in Peshawar. She also indicates that items like old copper pots are often repurposed, noting that a pot she once owned while she lived in Pakistan showed up as a prop on a Pakistani TV program. She also indicated that beautiful old wooden architectural carvings are shipped out of Pakistan by the container load. The use of modern air conditioning has prompted homeowners to strip wood decorations out of their homes because it does not react well to an air-conditioned environment. KFG does not believe a MOU will have any positive impact on the preservation of cultural heritage because of the endemic corruption in Pakistan.
Rachael Fulton Brown asks KFG if she believes import restrictions limited to specific period like the Hellenistic and Gandharan period could be effective. KFG did not believe so because of the endemic corruption. She also notes in passing that the material seized by the NY DA left Pakistan at least ten years ago and much of it appeared to be fake.
Ricardo St. Hilaire asks BD if he agrees with KFG’s characterizations of an internal market in Pakistan. He indicates that while such a market is tolerated, that does not mean that it legal or that such material would be allowed to be exported. BD believes that a MOU would function as a loadstar to encourage Pakistani officials to crack down on corruption and the illicit trade.
Karol Wight asks BD to comment on museum loans in the absence of an AAMD (Association of Art Museum Directors) representative speaking. BD indicates there has been efforts to secure loans. He suggests that the visa problems Pakistani couriers had transporting an exhibit to the Asia Society may have made Pakistan gun shy. He believes that a MOU could smooth over such issues.
Mark Hendricks asks BD whether he believes that the existence of a large internal market in Pakistan will limit the impact of a MOU on looting. BD believes that a MOU will help encourage Pakistani officials to crack down on illegal activity and prohibit illicit exports.
Anthony Wisniewski asks BD if items made in quantity can have cultural significance. BD answers they can because studying groups of objects can tell us significant things about ancient cultures. He gives the example of the forensic examination of the metallurgy of a collection of bronze ingots.
Anthony Wisniewski asks PT whether a coin made outside of Pakistan could be claimed as Pakistani under the CPIA. PT indicated this would require Pakistan to demonstrate with scholarly evidence that the coin type was only found in Pakistan or show that a particular coin actually came from there. He also indicated that it would be difficult to show that such a coin had cultural significance to Pakistan. PT believes that BD has confused archaeological interest with cultural significance, which requires an object to have importance to a given culture. He indicated that it would be difficult for Pakistan to show that a coin made outside of Pakistan had cultural significance to Pakistan.
Chairman Passantino then thanked the speakers and CPAC went into a recess before reconvening in a closed session.
Post a Comment