The State Department’s website has given advanced notice of a Cultural Property Advisory Committee Meeting to discuss new cultural property Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with Lebanon and Mongolia and a renewal with El Salvador.
The proposed MOU with Lebanon should be highly controversial. The UNESCO Convention assumes that nation states are the “best stewards” of cultural heritage and MOUs authorize US Customs to repatriate cultural goods seized under them to their care. But Lebanon is a failing state. The power there is not in the weak and corrupt government, but Hezbollah (“the Party of God”), a heavily armed Shiite militia group that acts as the Iranian regime’s proxy force against Israel and the United States. The United States Government has designated Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, and right now, it has been raining down rockets on Northern Israel, forcing residents to flee. Israel, of course, has retaliated, shelling and bombing parts of Lebanon intensively in an effort to root out Hezbollah terrorists and their allies.How then can a MOU with Lebanon even be considered? Repatriating objects to failed states that have become war zones is not a recipe for their “protection” under any circumstance. Moreover, the State Department's Cultural Heritage Center and its "partner organization," the Antiquities Coalition, have claimed that "looted antiquities" are a significant terrorist funding source. RAND Corporation and others dispute such claims, but given that “narrative” shouldn’t the State Department also be concerned that Hezbollah will resell whatever may be returned for funds?
The public session will take place September 24, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. (EDT).
Proposed new MOUs with Lebanon and Mongolia that will likely again cover collectors coins that circulated regionally or internationally making it difficult to import them from legitimate markets in Europe again underscores the need for HR 7865. More here: https://accguild.org/HR-7865
Addendum (8/19/24): Regulations.gov is now accepting comments for these MOUs. Here is a direct link to comment: https://www.regulations.gov/document/DOS-2024-0028-0001
Alternatively, go to Regulations.gov and then search for DOS-2024-0028.
What should you say? Of course, it is much better to speak in your own words, but here is a template for coin collectors:
CPAC should reject any MOU with Lebanon. Any such MOU would not help "protect" cultural heritage. Rather, repatriating artifacts would be disastrous for their continued preservation. Lebanon is a failed state dominated by Hezbollah, a terrorist group and Iranian proxy at war with Israel and the United States. There is no money to properly preserve artifacts and there is a real danger they will be either destroyed in a conflict or sold to fund Hezbollah's terrorist activities.
Additionally, there is no reason to apply import restrictions to coins for Lebanon, Mongolia or El Salvador. For most of their history, these countries were but small parts of much larger Empires, meaning all or most all coins that circulated there also circulated in much greater quantities elsewhere. One simply cannot assume that coins of a particular type were found there, a prerequisite for them being restricted under the governing statute.
1 comment:
Hezbollah is no terrorist group. It simply exists to counter Israeli warmongering in the region. It's ridiculous to speak of Hezbollah "raining down rockets on Northern Israel" without acknowledging that this is in direct response to Israel's targeted killings in Lebanon. It's also ridiculous to cast doubt on the veracity of the 'looting funds terrorism' narrative, then turn around and make that narrative the main argument against the proposed MOUs.
I do understand the realpolitik of the situation: Whereas an appeal to the actual facts will probably fall on deaf CPAC ears, an appeal to the self-interests of political appointees wishing to stay on the right-side of the Israel lobby might be more effective. However, it's a bridge too far when I see videos of bloody kids with half their face blown off, writhing, screaming, barely clinging to life while our politicians take AIPAC campaign cash and parrot whatever lines their handlers feed them.
I'll sit this one out. I'm far more worried about the malign influence of dirty money on our political system than about these MOUs which are probably quid-pro-quo deals decided before the public has even had the opportunity to comment. We have bigger fish to fry and most of them reside in Foggy Bottom Swamp.
Jesse Hoffman
Post a Comment