Saturday, November 7, 2026

Protecting Archaeological Context Over Protecting Due Process and Private Property Rights of Collectors, the Trade and Museums- CPAC Meets to Discuss new Cultural Property Agreement Renewals with Cyprus, Guatemala and Peru

 On October 27, 2026, the US Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC) met in a virtual public session to accept comments regarding proposed Cultural Property Agreement renewals with Cyprus, Guatemala and Peru.   Questions from CPAC members again drove home the feeling that as far as the Committee was concerned protecting archaeological context takes precedence over protecting the due process and private property rights of collectors even for lawful exports from Cyprus’ sister European Union (EU) Member states. 

The State Department described these renewals with Cyprus and Peru as follows:

Cyprus

Extending the Cyprus Agreement would continue import restrictions on categories of archaeological material ranging in date from approximately the 11th millennium B.C. to A.D. 1770, and ethnological material ranging in date from approximately the fourth century A.D. to A.D. 1878.

Peru

Extending the Peru Agreement would continue import restrictions on categories of archaeological material ranging in date from approximately 12,000 B.C. to A.D. 1532, and ethnological material dating to the colonial period (A.D. 1532 to 1821).

No information was provided about the renewal with Guatemala.

See https://www.state.gov/cultural-property-advisory-committee-meeting-october-27-29-2026 (last visited November 4, 2026).

The meeting was conducted entirely on Zoom.  None of the CPAC or State Department staff other than CPAC’s Chair identified themselves, so it was difficult to confirm who attended the meeting, except where members themselves spoke.

Currently, CPAC has the following members (all Biden holdovers):  (1) Alexandra Jones (Chair, Represents/Expertise Archaeology, Anthropology, related fields, CEO Archaeology in the Community, Washington, DC); (2) Alex Barker (Represents/Expertise Archaeology, Anthropology, related fields) Director, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Arkansas); (3) Miriam Stark, Represents/Expertise Archaeology, Anthropology, related fields, Professor of Anthropology, University of Hawaii); (4) Nii Otokunor Quarcoopome (Represents/Expertise Museums, Curator and Department head, Detroit Museum of Art); ( (5) Andrew Conners (Represents/Expertise Museums, Director, Albuquerque Museum, New Mexico); (6) Michael Findlay (Represents/Expertise: International Sale of Cultural Property, Director, Acquavella Galleries, New York) and; (7) Cynthia Herbert (Represents/Expertise: International Sale of Cultural Property President, Appretium Appraisal Services LLC, Connecticut); (8) Amy Cappellazzo, Represents/Expertise: International Sale of Cultural Property, Principal, Art Intelligence Global; (9) Thomas R. Lamont (Represents Public, President of Lamont Consulting Services, LLC, Illinois);  (10) Susan Schoenfeld Harrington  (Represents Public, Past Deputy Finance Chair, Democratic National Committee, Past Board member, China Art Foundation); and, (11) William Teitelman (Represents General Public, Legislative Counsel to the PA Trial Lawyers Association, Attorney (Retired)).

The Chair, Alexandra Jones, welcomed the speakers.  She thanked the speakers for attending and then indicated that speakers should try to limit themselves to 5 minutes and given the number of presenters. 

Peter Tompa spoke first as the Executive Director of the International Association of Professional Numismatists (IAPN).  Tompa indicated that “due process” requires a major reset of current import restrictions on coins.  He first recounted his experience advocating for coin collectors before CPAC starting with Cyprus’ initial request for import restrictions back in 1998.  After this initial hearing and another renewal coins were exempted.  However, according to CPAC’s chairman at the time as well as a CPAC member representing the trade, when the issue came up again in 2007, the State Department rejected CPAC’s recommendations against including coins and then misled the public about CPAC’s true recommendations in official government reports.  Tompa further indicated that the one Court asked to address this injustice refused to do so, instead ruling that the issue was not subject to judicial review as a “foreign policy matter.”  Even worse, this decision carried over to a related forfeiture action where the Court even precluded the use of expert testimony to rebut the presumption that the coins that were seized were “Cypriot cultural property.”    Considering a recent NY Appellate Court decision holding that collectors are entitled to “due process” before their cultural goods are seized, Tompa requested CPAC to seek a reset of current restrictions, so they only apply to coins traced directly to Cyprus.  He further requested CPAC to endorse less drastic measures including recognizing legal exports from Cyprus’ sister EU countries and applying protections found in the Administrative Procedure Act and Civil Asset Forfeiture to import restrictions on cultural goods.

Here are IAPN’s written comments.

Cyprus: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0010

Guatemala: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0008

Peru: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0009

IAPN’s oral comments can be found here: https://culturalpropertyobserver.blogspot.com/2026/10/due-process-demands-reset-of-current.html

Tompa’s personal comments can be found here:  https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0028

Yasha Bykhovsky, a coin dealer, cultural heritage advocate and art history student at U Mass Amhurst spoke next.  He asked for revisions to the Cypriot import restrictions on coins.  Specifically, he asked that they recognize that coins made in Cyprus are not necessarily found in Cyprus. He noted that ancient coins spread like US $1 bills today.  He also noted coins struck in Guatemala and Peru circulated widely as well and even served as legal tender in the US before 1857.  He acknowledged that cultural heritage preservation is an important goal, but it must be balanced with protecting lawful trade.

CPAC member Alex Barker questioned Bykhovsky about his views.  Bykhovsky indicated that coins legally exported from Germany, a fellow email member to Cyprus, should be treated differently than coins exported from elsewhere.   He indicated that we should help Cyprus, but not to the extreme of ignoring EU regulations.

CPAC member Miriam Stark asked Bykhovksy whether he believed unprovenanced coins should be allowed to be imported into the US.  Bykhovsky replied that he believes recording provenance is important, but many coins simply lack it. 

Dr. Ömür Harmanşah spoke as the Vice President for Cultural Heritage, Archaeological Institute of America (AIA).  He first provided background about the organization.  The AIA currently has 150,000 members, a figure that includes not only professional archaeologists, but others interested in archaeology, including subscribers to the AIA’s magazine.   The AIA supports all three Cultural Property Agreements (CPAs), but he focused his comments on Cyprus.   He indicated that Cyprus was an important center of the copper trade in ancient times and archaeology has been instrumental in uncovering evidence of trading relationships.  In the past, there have been important exhibits of Cypriot objects in the US.  There is a long history of collaboration.  The Cyprus American Archaeological Research Institute (CAARI) has been instrumental in this regard.  Research of auction sales of undocumented Cypriot artifacts during the period 1998-2006 suggests evidence of looting that the CPA has addressed. 

Here are links to the AIA’s written comments.

Cyprus: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0126

Guatemala: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0125

Peru: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0123

Sonja Rapcanova spoke for CINOA.  She indicated that CINOA, founded in 1935, is an international confederation of professional art and antiques dealer organizations across Europe, North America and Australia, collectively representing approximately 5,000 businesses.  She further indicated that the professional art trade is not separate from the protection and preservation of cultural heritage, but rather is part of it.  She further noted that dealers do far more than facilitate transactions. They research objects, investigate their provenance, contribute specialist knowledge and help bring works of historical and cultural significance into public collections.  She specifically asked CPAC to reevaluate current blanket restrictions because categories of diverse objects should not be necessarily treated the same.  She also indicated that there should be a reassessment of import restrictions imposed on legal exports from the EU given Cyprus’ membership in that trade group. She noted that CINOA's objective is not to weaken cultural heritage protection, but to ensure that restrictions remain evidence-based, appropriately targeted and workable in practice.

CINOA’s written comments can be found here:  https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0098

Arthur Needham is a numismatic researcher who is a visiting Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society and the Royal Numismatic Society.  He is a coauthor of the Coins of India book series and an expert on the use of coinage along the Silk Road.  He drew on that experience to educate the Committee about how coins circulated in the millions throughout the ancient world based on their intrinsic value.  He has personally recorded Byzantine and Roman coins in India.  He also questioned the use of ancient coins as dating tools for archaeologists because they circulated for 100s of years.

CPAC member Alex Barker challenged Needham about the importance of coins as archaeological objects.  CPAC member Miriam Stark asked Needham about his work with the Archaeological Survey of India and how it meshed with India’s strong cultural heritage laws.  She also questioned why other work was not undertaken under official auspices.  CPAC member Teitelman also debated Neeham about the importance of coins as archaeological objects. 

Tom Landvatter is an archaeologist who excavates in Vigla in Cyprus.  He emphasized the importance of including coins in import restrictions because he maintained that they were critical for dating purposes.   He argued that coins found at his site helped understand the site’s use by mercenaries associated with Alexander the Great.  CPAC member Teitelman complimented Landvetter on his explanation of the importance of coin finds.  [CPO Note- It is unclear why less drastic measures like better site security in the long off season and effective regulation of metal detectors is not considered first to protect archaeological sites.]

Landvetter’s written comments can be found here: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0063

Andrew Vaughn next spoke as the Executive Director of the American Society of Overseas Research (ASOR).  Vaugh discussed ASOR’s collaboration with the Cypriot Department of Antiquities and maintained that the renewal of the CPA was critical to both the US and Cyprus.

Dr. David Soren conducted archaeological excavations in Kourion, Cyprus, in the 1970s and 1980s.  He recalled that during that time coins and pottery were targets of looters.  He also recalled being shown a room of looted material by Cypriot authorities which made him want to cry. 

Mike Festa spoke on behalf of the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG).  He joked that as the former head of the AARP in Massachusetts he was happy to see so many potential AARP members on the Zoom call.  He acknowledged the importance of protecting archaeological strata but also indicated that this goal should not take precedence over protecting the due process rights collectors.  He elaborated that it was unfair to seize coins based on their type alone and then leave it to collectors to try to prove the negative that their coins were legitimate. This does not help archaeology.  Instead, it just hurts innocent collectors. This is particularly true for coins and other artifacts legally exported from Europe.

The ACCG’s written comments can be found here:  https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0026

Mike Festa’s personal comments can be found here:  https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0027

Kathryn Grossman is an associate professor of anthropology at North Carolina State University.   She is the Director of the Makounta-Voules Archaeological Project, an excavation project and field school located in western Cyprus. During her time in Cyprus, she saw looting firsthand at pit burials where looters were looking for small statuary used as offerings.  In one looter’s pit she found fragments of a modern work glove.

Professor Grossman’s written testimony can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0049

Lindy Crewe spoke as the Director of the Cyprus American Archaeological Research Institute (CAARI).  CAARI was the only archaeological research Center to be established following the Turkish invasion of the northern part of the Island.  The CPA is important to protect against looting, particularly from that part of the Island under Cypriot control.

CAARI’s written comments can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0052

Barbara Arroyo is an archaeologist specializing in the Pre-Columbian Indigenous societies of Southern Mesoamerica.  She has conducted research on the Pacific Coast of Chiapas, Mexico, Guatemala, and El Salvador and is currently associated with the University of Chicago.  Arroyo expressed concern about looting by indigenous people as part of land grabs.  She also indicated that a change in Guatemalan law has facilitated looting.  Finally, she described a case where a collector returned a lintel to Mexico which more properly belonged to Guatemala.  Guatemalan authorities have been unsuccessful in gaining its return from Mexico.

Arroyo’s written testimony can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0105

Markus Erbel is an archaeologist who excavates in Guatemala for Vanderbilt University.    Looting, pillage, illegal excavations, and illicit trafficking are a pervasive threat to Guatemala’s patrimony. These go hand in hand with agricultural activities. Erbel has been involved in trying to protect sites in Guatemala by coordinating with the military to monitor his site during the long off season. It is important to engage local communities.  He noted that Guatemalan textbooks for students do not cover the Maya.

Erbel’s written testimony can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2026-1058-0097

The Chair allows additional questions.  CPAC member Miriam Stark askes Lindy Crewe of CAARI about looting in Cyprus.  Crewe indicated metal detectors were used to seek out coins.  Metal detectors are only supposed to be used on beaches under Cypriot law, but they are frequently used elsewhere.  Folk tales about buried gold are an incentive.

The Chair then ended the public portion of the hearing, thanking the speakers for their time.