Here is what I said, more or less, at yesterday's virtual Cultural Property Advisory Committee Meeting. I hope to post a full report of that meeting shortly:
The Trump Administration’s emphasis on promoting American
business and scaling back regulations requires this Committee to consider a new
paradigm, one which facilitates the lawful trade in common items like coins,
particularly where they are already legally available for sale in countries
seeking restrictions.
There is no
better place to start than Italy. Since
2011 there has been an embargo in place on ancient coins of Italian types minted
before 211 BC. During this same period, Italy’s Carabinieri
have mounted a successful campaign against looters without damaging Italy’s
large, lawful numismatic market.
What does IAPN
request? First, we join hundreds of coin
collectors to oppose expanding the current designated list past 211 BC to encompass late Roman Republican and
Imperial coins.
Prior committees that considered the
initial MOU in 2001 and subsequent renewals for 2005, 2011, 2016 and 2021 all came
to the same conclusion buttressed by current research: One simply cannot assume
that all such coins are “Italian cultural property” when only 5.24% of the 15,000
Roman Imperial coins hoards containing over 6 million coins are found within
Italy itself.
The current Italian designated list also
needs to be reformed. At a minimum—using
the Greek designated list as a model—larger denomination coins which circulated
in international trade should be delisted.
We also request
that any renewal be conditioned on Italy facilitating the export of any item
legally available for sale within Italy itself.
Despite solemn promises, Italy has actually made it harder to export
ancient coins. Finally, this Committee
should also require that US Customs accept legal exports from sister EU
countries as legal imports of items on the Italian designated list. Such a modification of the current MOU is not
only consistent with the UNESCO Convention, but also with Italian law.
The proposed
MOU with Vietnam raises similar issues. A
past IAPN President who visited the UNESCO World Heritage site of Hue (pronounced
“Hugh”) earlier this week reports that cash coins up for restriction here are
for sale to tourists at a gift shop there.
More than that, any import
restrictions will only cause confusion. Chinese
cash coins found in Vietnam also circulated in far greater numbers in China. They should be restricted, if at all, under
the current Chinese MOU. No Vietnamese
coins should be restricted. The earliest Vietnamese coins are virtually
identical to Chinese prototypes from the post-Tang period which are not
restricted under the MOU with China. Later Vietnamese coins, particularly the
machine struck coins of the French protectorate struck in France or at the US
Mint, do not meet the threshold requirements for either archaeological or
ethnological objects.
As for the other MOUs, the designated
list for Morocco does not provide fair notice to importers. It simply recounts all the ancient and early
modern civilizations whose coin types circulated within Morocco without naming
specific types exclusively found there. Limiting restrictions to types that
“circulated primarily” in Morocco fails to correct this problem, particularly
where the vast majority “circulated
primarily” elsewhere. Accordingly, if restrictions are to continue, the current
designated list must be limited to bronze coin types issued by Moroccan mints
for local circulation.
Finally, there should be no new
restrictions on coins for Chile or Costa Rica.
Spanish Colonial and early Republican era coinage that circulated in
these countries also circulated in far greater numbers elsewhere, including as legal
tender here in the United States until 1857.
They are as much part of US cultural heritage as they are of these
nations.
Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment