Showing posts with label Cameroon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cameroon. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Summary of CPAC Meeting to Discuss Proposed Cultural Property Agreement with Cameroon, Renewals of Cultural Property Agreements with Colombia and Türkiye, and a Renewal of Emergency Import Restrictions for Afghanistan

 On September 15, 2025, the US Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC) met in a virtual public session to accept comments regarding a proposed Cultural Property Agreement  (CPA) or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Cameroon, Renewals of current CPAs with Colombia and Türkiye, and a renewal of current “emergency” import restrictions with Afghanistan.

The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs’ (ECA’s) website describes these requests as follows:

https://www.state.gov/cultural-property-advisory-committee-meeting-september-15-17-2025/  (last visited September 15, 2025).

Cameroon

The Government of the Republic of Cameroon seeks protection for archaeological and ethnological materials from 100,000 B.C. to the 19th century A.D., from the following time periods and cultures: Paleolithic (circa 100,000 – 2,000 B.C.), Neolithic (circa 9,000 – 500 B.C.), Metal Age (circa 3,000 – 300 B.C.), Historic Period (circa 1500 A.D.), Ethnological Period (circa 1,000 B.C. – 19th century A.D.), including objects made from stone (tools and weapons), ceramic (pottery and vessels), metal (jewelry, weapons, tools), fossil and bone (human and animal remains). The ethnological materials requested include objects made from wood (masks, statues, furniture), metal (jewelry, weapons, tools), textiles (ceremonial clothing, tapestries, embroidery), animal skins (clothing, drums, ritual objects), and bone (jewelry, tools, ritual objects).

Afghanistan

Extending emergency import restrictions unilaterally imposed by the United States on archaeological and ethnological material from Afghanistan would continue import restrictions on categories of archaeological material ranging in date from the Paleolithic Period (50,000 B.C.) through the beginning of the Durrani Dynasty (1747 A.D.), and ethnological material ranging in date from approximately 800 A.D. to 1920 A.D.

Colombia

Extending the Colombia MOU would continue import restrictions on categories of archaeological material ranging in date from approximately 1500 B.C. to 1530 A.D., and ecclesiastical ethnological material of the Colonial period ranging in date from approximately 1530 A.D. to 1830 A.D.

Türkiye

Extending the Türkiye MOU would continue import restrictions on categories of archaeological material ranging in date from approximately 1.2 million years ago to 1770 A.D., and ethnological material ranging in date from the 1st century A.D. to 1923 A.D.

The CPAC members did not introduce themselves before the public session, but CPAC currently includes the following individuals, all  appointed by President Biden: (1) Alexandra Jones (Chair, Represents/Expertise Archaeology, Anthropology, related fields, CEO Archaeology in the Community, Washington, DC); (2) Alex Barker (Represents/Expertise Archaeology, Anthropology, related fields) Director, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Arkansas); (3) Mirriam Stark, Represents/Expertise Archaeology, Anthropology, related fields, Professor of Anthropology, University of Hawaii); (4) Nii Otokunor Quarcoopome (Represents/Expertise Museums, Curator and Department head, Detroit Museum of Art); ( (5) Andrew Conners (Represents/Expertise Museums, Director, Albuquerque Museum, New Mexico); (6) Michael Findlay (Represents/Expertise: International Sale of Cultural Property, Director, Acquavella Galleries, New York); (7) Amy Cappellazzo, Represents/Expertise: International Sale of Cultural Property, Principal, Art Intelligence Global; (8) Cynthia Herbert (Represents/Expertise: International Sale of Cultural Property President, Appretium Appraisal Services LLC, Connecticut); (9) Thomas R. Lamont (Represents Public, President of Lamont Consulting Services, LLC, Illinois);  (10) Susan Schoenfeld Harrington  (Represents Public, Past Deputy Finance Chair, Democratic National Committee, Past Board member, China Art Foundation); and, (11) William Teitelman (Represents General Public, Legislative Counsel to the PA Trial Lawyers Association, Attorney (Retired)).

There were also Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Cultural Heritage Center staff present, presumably including Glen Davis, Director of the Cultural Heritage Center and Andrew Zonderman, who is serving as CPAC’s Executive Director.  Messrs. Davis and Zonderman are new to their positions.  

The meeting was conducted entirely on Zoom.  None of the CPAC or ECA staff identified themselves to the speakers, so it was difficult to ascertain who attended the meeting.

The Chair, Alexandra Jones, welcomed the speakers.  She thanked the speakers for attending, indicated that all comments had been read, and that speakers should try to limit themselves to under five minutes each given the number of presenters. 

Dr. Ömür Harmanşah spoke as the Vice President for Cultural Heritage, Archaeological Institute of America (“AIA”).  Given time constraints, he focused his comments on Türkiye and Afghanistan.  He stated that Congress chartered the AIA in 1906 and that today it has over 100,000 members which includes professionals and members of the interested public.  Dr. Harmanşah argued that all four countries suffered from looting which is a global phenomenon. He praised Türkiye’s hosting of American archaeologists at long-term digs in places like Sardis.  He noted that the Afghan National Museum had partnered with the University of Chicago to document continued looting in the country after the Taliban took power.  Dr. Harmanşah himself has helped document looting in Türkiye.  Türkiye has taken strong measures to protect its own cultural heritage, including enforcement, repatriation efforts, the creation of museum inventories and the creation of a new “Red List” of Turkish archaeological materials at risk from looting.   Türkiye has also sent exhibitions to the US, including one about the Golden Age of Midas that was displayed at the University of Pennsylvania. 

The AIA’s written comments about the proposed renewal of emergency import restrictions for Afghanistan can be found here:  can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0088

The AIA’s written comments on the proposed MOU with Cameroon can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0089

The AIA’s written comments about the renewal with Colombia can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0086

The AIA’s written comments about the renewal with Türkiye can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0085

Peter Tompa spoke as executive director for the International Association of Professional Numismatists (IAPN).  He indicated that IAPN opposed renewals for Afghanistan and Türkiye and takes no position on a MOU for Cameroon or a renewal for Colombia as long as coins are not included.  He focused his comments on Afghanistan and Türkiye, stating that both renewals raised fundamental contradictions that could not be reconciled.  He referenced the Taliban’s past destruction of historic statues and current blessing of a Chinese copper mine that will swallow up an important Buddhist site.  He further stated that ongoing looting with the full knowledge of local warlords who have pledged allegiance to the Taliban cannot be considered an “emergency.”   As for Türkiye, he noted that its government’s aggressive repatriation efforts abroad must be contrasted with its encouragement of treasure hunting on Jewish and Christian sites at home as well as its conversion of historic churches into mosques.   He further stated that extensive “designated lists” that cover coins that circulated regionally and internationally only hurt legitimate trade.  As a solution, he suggested that the Trump Administration apply the Administrative Procedure Act to the creation of designated lists and the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act to enforcement. 

Peter Tompa’s oral statement can be found here: 

https://culturalpropertyobserver.blogspot.com/2025/09/renewals-for-afghanistan-and-Türkiye.html

IAPN’s written comments on proposed renewal of emergency import restrictions for Afghanistan can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0035

IAPN’s written comments on renewal with Colombia can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0032

IAPN’s written comments on the renewal with Türkiye can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0038

Peter Tompa’s personal comments can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0059

Dr. John Hoopes (University of Kansas) spoke in support of a renewal of the MOU with Colombia.  He has excavated in the country for 30 years.  Pottery and gold artifacts are sought by looters, making the renewal of the current MOU to be essential in helping to protect Colombia’s cultural heritage.  There are many sites yet to be excavated, just being discovered with the help of modern imaging techniques. 

Kate FitzGibbon spoke as Executive Director of the Committee of Cultural Policy (CCP) against the renewal of the current emergency import restrictions on behalf of Afghanistan. FitzGibbon has a special interest in the country after living there for 30 years working primarily with Afghan women who make textiles.  FitzGibbon raised four main points.  First, any renewal is inconsistent with statutory intent.  The Cultural Property Implementation Act (CPIA) § 2603 only authorizes narrow, time-limited, exceptional measures when there is an immediate crisis—targeted to clearly defined categories that meet an evidentiary emergency standard—so that US border controls can actually reduce the incentive for pillage. Congress did not design § 2603 to function as a rolling, multi-year embargo across whole civilizations. Second, the destination problem is real and unavoidable. Under the CPIA’s return rule, designated material forfeited in the US must first be offered back to the State Party. Today that means return to the Taliban and their Interior Minister, Sirajuddin Haqqani, a US-wanted terrorist.  Third, the policy is mis-aimed.  The Afghan government, not the US art market, is the problem.  The most acute threats to Afghanistan’s heritage today are state-sanctioned or militia-enabled extractions and earthmoving, most notably the destruction of the important Buddhist site of Mes Aynak to mine copper.  Finally, the emergency standard has been stretched past recognition. A catch-all designated list spanning 70,000 years of culture through A.D. 1920, renewed in five-year blocks, is not what § 2603 authorizes.  Such a broad designated list only hurts legitimate trade and threatens to sweep up and repatriate the personal property of Afghan refugees.  Instead, the US Government should prioritize diaspora protection and safe-haven pathways and create custodial trusteeship options with US museums and libraries for Afghan materials until a legitimate government exists.

Testimony opposing the Afghan renewal submitted on behalf of the CCP and its sister organization, the Global Heritage Alliance (GHA), can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0091

FitzGibbon also submitted written testimony on behalf of the CCP and GHA that opposed or questioned aspects of new or renewed MOUs with Cameroon, Colombia and Türkiye.  

The CCP’s and GHA’s written testimony on a proposed new MOU with Cameroon can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0079

The CCP’s and GHA’s written testimony on a proposed renewal of a MOU with Colombia can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0080

The CCP’s and GHA’s written testimony on a proposed renewal of a MOU with Türkiye can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0083

Randy Myers spoke as a board member on behalf of the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG). He also spoke on behalf of the American Numismatic Association (ANA).  He touched on several points related to the renewals for Afghanistan and Türkiye.  First, he indicated the time provided to comment of 31 days is inadequate; instead a full 60 days should be provided as set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act.   Second, Myers noted that current import restrictions on coins ignore the statutory provisions that limit them to archaeological objects of “cultural significance” that were “first discovered within” and “subject to export control” of a given country.  He emphasized that unlike many ancient artifacts, coins are mass produced, with dies used to strike 13,000 coins each.  This large production of coins combined with their wide dispersion means that one cannot assume that particular coin types are found in a given country.  For example, coins on the current designated list for Türkiye are found as far West as Spain and as far East as India.  Finally, he notes that the State Department has produced no information to suggest that the MOU with Türkiye has been effective.

The ACCG’s and ANA’s written comments regarding the renewal of emergency import restrictions for Afghanistan can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0030

The ACCG’s and ANA’s written comments regarding the renewal of the CPA with Türkiye emergency can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0031

Elias Gerasoulis spoke as executive director of the GHA and also as a board member of the American Hellenic Institute to oppose the Turkish renewal.  The Turkish CPA should not be renewed because it will only further encourage Türkiye to erase the cultural heritage of its displaced minority Christian and Jewish populations. Türkiye has tried to rewrite the histories of its historic churches.  It has licensed looting of Christian and Jewish sites.  It has precluded Christian religious orders from owning their own property.  It has occupied a significant part of Cyprus, looting and destroying numerous churches.  It’s government actively works against religious freedom. 

Lucy Varpetian appeared on behalf of the Armenian Bar Association.  The Armenian Bar Association submitted comments, but Ms. Varpetian used her time to read a letter to CPAC from Congressman Gus Bilirakis (R-Florida) opposing a renewal of the MOU with Türkiye.   Congressman Bilirakis wrote CPAC as a co-chair of the Congressional International Religious Freedom Caucus.  That letter noted that Türkiye had failed to protect the cultural heritage of its religious minorities, most notably by converting historic churches into mosques.  The asking that the MOU not be renewed, Bilirakis concludes that, “[t]he government that destroys its minorities’ historical property should not have the right to repatriate them at their pleasure.” 

The Armenian Bar Association’s written comments can be found here: 

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0072

After this presentation, one CPAC member (William Teitelman?) noted he was Jewish and indicated to Ms. Varpetian that the concerns of religious minorities would be considered. 

Rabbi Eric Fusfield is Deputy Director, International Center for Human Rights and Public Policy, Director of Legislative Affairs, B'nai B'rith International. He argues that there should be a carve out from current import restriction for Türkiye for ritual and ceremonial objects.   These are currently found on the designated list for Türkiye, but they really belong to Jewish and Christian communities, not the Turkish state.  Rabbi Fusfield holds up a Kiddish cup as an example.  His wife’s family comes from a Middle Eastern country, and they were not allowed to take such items with them when they were forced to flee.  If these items remain on “designated lists,” he thinks such items that may be seized by US Customs should be turned over to the communities in exile, particularly whereas in Türkiye there are so few members of the Jewish faith still living there these days.

Dr. Peri Johnson is an archaeologist teaching at the University of Illinois Chicago.  She supports a renewal of the CPA with Türkiye because looting is still a major problem there.  She has seen instances where heavy machinery was brought in to help loot sites.  Around 50% of the archaeological digs in Türkiye are meant to rescue items before they can be taken by looters. 

Dr. Elizabeth Prodromou is a visiting professor in the international studies program at Boston College.  Prodromou served a diplomatic appointment on the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (2004-2012), and she was a member of the US Secretary of State’s Religion & Foreign Policy Working Group (2011-2015).  Dr. Promdmou believes that the current agreement is in violation of Article 9 of the UNESCO Convention because it can be seen as “green lighting” Türkiye’s erasure of minority cultures, most recently the conversion of the Cathedral of Ani into a mosque. The renewal of the MOU should be rejected, but if it is renewed, there should be an individualized provenance review for contested items to determine whether the object was originally created by a community that no longer exists in modern Türkiye or whose property rights have not been acknowledged.

Dr. Prodromou’s written testimony, joining the comments of the Armenian Bar Association, can be found here:

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOS-2025-0203-0078

Dr. Simon Maghakyan is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Oxford. He indicates his support of the comments of the Armenian Bar Association.  He indicates that another reason the MOU should be rejected is on account of Türkiye’s support for Azerbaijan in its war to erase Armenian culture heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh.  He also notes that he has studied and written a Newsweek article about state-sanctioned treasure hunting of former Armenian areas in Türkiye.  This article is cited in the Armenian Bar Association’s comments at page 3. He urges CPAC to adopt the 6 safeguards proposed in the Armenian Bar Association’s comments.  These safeguards are discussed in depth at pages 6-7 of those comments.

Dr. Brian Rose is the James B. Pritchard Professor of Archaeology at the University of Pennsylvania in the Classical Studies Department and the Graduate Group in the Art and Archaeology of the Mediterranean World. He is also Peter C. Ferry Curator-in-Charge of the Mediterranean Section of the Penn Museum.  He supports the renewal of the MOU with Türkiye believing that it is essential to help combat continued looting in the country.  Türkiye has taken adequate measures to protect its own cultural heritage.  These include the use of drones to surveil sites and an active repatriation program, with the help of the Manhattan DA’s office.

One CPAC member (William Teitelman?) asks Dr. Rose about Türkiye’s aggressive efforts to erase minority cultures.   Dr. Rose can only say he has not personally seen any such activities and that the Turkish colleagues he deals with respect all cultures.  He also indicates that he is aware of Türkiye’s efforts to turn Hagia Sophia into a mosque but offers no other comments. 

Monday, September 15, 2025

Cultural Property Agreement Renewals for Afghanistan and Turkey Raise Unreconcilable Contradictions

This is what I said at today's CPAC hearing:  

Thank you for this opportunity to speak on behalf of the International Association of Professional Numismatists.  IAPN opposes renewals for Afghanistan and  for Turkey.  IAPN takes no position on a new MOU for Cameroon or a renewal for Colombia, but opposes any import restrictions on coins.  The coins that circulated in these two countries simply don’t meet the criteria for either archaeological or ethnological objects.  Historical coinage that circulated in Colombia was also US legal tender before 1857 and the first official issues of Cameroon were late 19th century coinage of the German Empire.

I would like to focus my comments today on Afghanistan and Turkey.  Both renewals raise fundamental contradictions that cannot possibly be reconciled.

Proponents argue that import restrictions promote cultural heritage preservation and are only directed against keeping recently looted material off the market.  However, such claims are misleading at best given the reality on the ground in both countries and the way US Customs enforces  import restrictions as embargoes on material imported from legal markets abroad, chiefly in Europe.  

Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers blew up the  Bamiyan Buddhas and smashed statuary at the Kabul Museum.  More recent efforts at bribing them into caring with money for “conservation projects” can’t compete with Chinese business interests which are in the process of destroying a major Buddhist site at Mes Aynak to mine copper.   Moreover, any looting has been going on for decades, all under the watchful eyes of local warlords.  The only difference now is that they pledge allegiance to the Taliban.  Such long term looting with the full knowledge of government authorities simply does not qualify as an  “emergency.”   Finally, despite the AIA’s claims to the contrary, Section 1216 of the National Defense Authorization Act is no safe harbor provision because it only covers institutional loans.  In fact, US law requires repatriation to the Taliban once diplomatic relations are restored, and  any decision will be made on a basis other than the safety of the objects.

Meanwhile, Erdogan’s aggressive repatriation efforts abroad must be contrasted with his government’s active promotion of  “treasure hunting” at former Jewish and Christian sites at home.  This is just another provocation directed at minority religious groups like the conversion of Hagia Sophia and the Cathedral at Ani into mosques. 

For coins, extensive “designated lists” which cover coins that circulated regionally or internationally only hurt legitimate trade.  Efforts to limit such lists to coins “sourced” to Afghanistan or which “circulated primarily” in Turkey are meaningless since US Customs seizes coins based on their  “type” alone.  That means pretty much all ancient and early modern coins are now at risk unless the importer can prove the “negative” that they were out of a given country before the effective date of the governing regulations or for at least 10 years    While  enforcement has been spotty, it does occur with the results being that collectors have their property taken with little, if any, “due process.” 

Going forward, the best solution would be for the Trump Administration to make  preparing designated lists  subject to the Administrative Procedure Act and for any detentions, seizures and forfeitures of cultural property to be subject to the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000.  The former would require the government to justify the inclusion of specific coin types in the designated lists and the latter would help  ensure that import restrictions only apply in situations where there was some evidence that the coin in question was illicitly exported from a country with a MOU or emergency restrictions after the date of the governing regulations.

Thank you for your consideration of the views of the micro businesses of the numismatic trade.

Sunday, August 10, 2025

"Soft Power" Love for the Taliban: Trump State Department Continues to Prioritize the Interests of Foreign Despots and Archaeological Advocacy Groups Over Those of American Citizens

Collectors hoping Trump II would “make collecting great again" have been sorely disappointed.  Instead, giveaways in the form of Cultural Property Agreements or Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) to foreign despots, their cultural bureaucracies, and US based archaeological advocacy groups that are dependent on foreign excavation permits continue to be approved at an accelerated pace. 

These MOUs impose confiscatory import restrictions on cultural goods.  They are justified as  "soft power" measures aimed at encouraging even "failed states" to "like us more."  Indeed, the push to complete as many agreements as possible has been so strong that the State Department has gone so far as to fund both foreign requests and "self-help" measures, both of which are supposed to be the responsibility of the foreign government.  Doge cuts or no, such funding in the form of cultural property implementation grants continues to appear on  the State Department Cultural Heritage Center website.  Of course, some of the prime beneficiaries are associated with the archaeological advocacy groups most identified with protecting the current status quo. For example, according to a federal grant tracking database, the Antiquities Coalition, one of the most active, has received over $3.3 million in grants from the State Department and USAID for work that has included "strengthen[ing] the U.S. commitment to preventing illegal trafficking and sale of antiquities into the United States from Uzbekistan, Nepal, and India by supporting the development of bilateral Cultural Property Agreements."

Trump has sought to overturn many "woke" Biden initiatives, but his Administration has nonetheless implemented Biden era decisions to impose import restrictions on behalf of Hindu nationalist India, authoritarian Uzbekistan, and even Hezbollah dominated Lebanon.  The Trump Administration may have hit India with 50% punitive tariffs and approved Israel's continued bombing campaign in Lebanon, but that hasn't stopped the US government from seizing and repatriating cultural goods to these countries.  

Moreover, after a short regulatory pause, the Trump State Department has even expanded these "soft power" efforts.  In May 2025, the State Department held a Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC)  Meeting to consider a new MOU with Communist Vietnam, and renewed agreements with Chile, Costa Rica, Italy and Morocco.  In so doing, the State Department denied a request from groups representing collectors and the trade to postpone the meeting to give time for Trump to appoint at least some CPAC members.  As it is, CPAC may be one of the last bodies in the federal government still  completely staffed with Biden political appointees.  

Now, at a time Congress is out of session and most of Washington, DC is enjoying summer vacation, the State Department has provided public notice of a September 2025 CPAC meeting to consider a renewal of even more controversial "emergency import restrictions" on behalf of Taliban Afghanistan, as well as a new MOU with authoritarian Cameroon, and renewals for Erdogan's Turkey and the Leftist government in Columbia.  

One preliminary question is whether the State Department has exceeded its statutory authority under the Cultural Property Implementation Act in considering renewals of import restrictions for Afghanistan, Columbia and Turkey.  The notice of the proposed extension for Afghanistan does not mention any request for a renewal or information received from the State Party that supports the determination that an emergency condition still exists. 19 U.S.C. Section 2602 (f) (2), 2603 (c) (1). The same issue arises with the notices of proposed extensions of MOUs for Columbia and Turkey.    Neither of those notices indicate that either country has requested a renewal of a current agreement or provide any information to justify it.  19 U.S.C. Section 2602 (a) (1), (a) (3), (e), (f) (2). Without any such request or supporting information  from a State Party, such restrictions can only be authorized by a special act of Congress as was done for post Saddam Iraq in 2001 and Assad's Syria in 2016.

Each of these proposals also raise important substantive concerns, but the renewal of "emergency import restrictions" on behalf of Taliban Afghanistan should be particularly troubling.  Why should the Trump  II Administration even consider repatriating cultural goods to the Taliban at all?  As was pointed out  by representatives of museums, collectors and the trade during a 2021 CPAC hearing to consider the initial request for import restrictions from the "former government of Afghanistan," the Taliban are far more known for dynamiting cultural heritage such as the Buddhas of Bamiyan than preserving it.  More recently, a Chinese mining company has moved forward with the blessing of Taliban officials on controversial plans to dig a copper mine under an important ancient Buddhist site at Mes Aynak.  Of course, the silence from archaeological advocacy groups that regularly condemn American collectors, dealers and museums as would be looters is deafening.  Indeed, the founder of the well-funded and politically connected Antiquities Coalition has gone so far as to praise Communist China's authoritarian, mercantilist, and nationalistic cultural heritage policy.   No matter the Chinese Communist's distinct lack of respect for Buddhist cultural heritage in Afghanistan as well as their promotion of Han cultural supremacy along with the state sponsored suppression and destruction of the cultural heritage of subject Tibetan and Uyghur cultures.  

So, why is the Trump Administration continuing on this same path?  It may simply be that the State Department bureaucracy has misled Administration officials about the true effect of MOUs and import restrictions on legitimate trade and collecting.  In an email announcing September's CPAC hearing, the State Department Cultural Heritage Center claims that import restrictions "bar trafficked cultural property from entering the United States while encouraging the legal exchange of cultural property for scientific, cultural and educational purposes."   What can be wrong with that!

In fact, plenty.  In reality, such import restrictions actually harm the legal exchange of cultural property because they operate as embargos on all cultural goods of "designated types," including those purchased on legal markets abroad, mostly in Europe.  Such a broad-brush approach is particularly damaging to the legitimate trade in historical coins.  Under it, once a coin is determined to be of a type that appears on a designated list, it may be detained, seized and repatriated based on nothing more than being one of many thousands of examples of such coins that may have circulated regionally if not internationally. 

Coin collectors continue to believe that the governing statute instead requires the government to at least demonstrate "probable cause" that a coin subject to detention, seizure and forfeiture was illicitly exported after the effective date of any governing regulations.  However, the State Department and US Customs convinced Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson and the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit to provide US law enforcement with a "green light" to seize and repatriate collector's coins solely based on their “type” as a "foreign policy matter."   Fast forward to the present, mainstream media lauded Wilkinson as a champion for the due process rights of  illegal aliens who were also allegedly gang members.   But what about "due process" for collectors?

This lack of due process matters because the current "safe harbor" for those importing restricted cultural goods was meant for valuable objects with long paper trails.  Moreover, overlapping designated lists for multiple countries of coin types subject to such import restrictions now regularly include coins that circulated regionally or even internationally.  All this makes it difficult, if not impossible, to import increasing numbers of historic collectors coins from legal markets abroad. Most collector's coins simply do not have the provenance documentation necessary for legal import under the current "safe harbor" provision. Given the limited value of most collector's coins and the great numbers found in most collections, most are unlikely to have documentation "proving" a particular coin left a specific country before the effective date of governing regulations. 

So what can collectors do?  

First, collectors should still comment on the proposed MOU with Cameroon as well as the proposed renewals of import restrictions for Afghanistan, Columbia and Turkey.  While one may think their comments don't matter, silence will be taken as acquiescence to the status quo.  Coin collectors should focus on the fact that embargoes on import of collector's coins makes no sense, particularly because one cannot assume that a coin type was only found in a particular country.  They can and should also describe how there are far too many coins out there for them all to be cared for by cultural bureaucracies, particularly ones in places like Afghanistan.  

Second, coin collectors should contact their Representative and Senators and ask them to support HR 595, a bill to facilitate the lawful exchange in collector's coins.

Finally, all collectors should advocate for more fundamental legislative reform to protect our due process rights before any collectibles are detained, seized and forfeited to a foreign government.  In view of the State Department’s continuation of the anti-collecting status quo, only legislative action can help "make collecting great again."

W